ArticlePloS one2026
Household and child correlates of child trafficking indicators in Eastern Sierra Leone.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Child trafficking indicators remain highly prevalent in Sierra Leone's Eastern Province, yet less is known about whether household-level correlates are robust when child-level variation within households is considered. This study examined household and child correlates of child trafficking indicators using baseline survey data from 2,429 households in Kailahun, Kenema, and Kono districts, including 5,999 rostered children aged 5-17. Child trafficking indicators were constructed from the survey's operational definition, including hazardous sectors, hazardous work conditions, and force, fraud, coercion, or restriction indicators. We estimated three complementary models: a household-level logistic model estimating associations with whether any child in the household had trafficking indicators, a grouped-binomial household model estimating associations with the number of affected children out of all rostered children aged 5-17, and a child-level logistic model estimating associations with each child's trafficking indicator status. Primary models used enumeration-area-clustered standard errors, with random-intercept models as sensitivity analyses. Overall, 49.2% of households had at least one child with trafficking indicators, and 33.8% of children had one or more trafficking indicators. Subjective economic strain was not a robust positive correlate in the primary household-level, grouped-binomial, or child-level models. In contrast, objective material wealth, school enrollment vulnerability, orphanhood, child age, and district context showed more consistent associations. In the primary household model, material wealth, having any child not enrolled in formal school, and having any orphan child were associated with higher odds of household trafficking indicators. In child-level models, older age and orphanhood were associated with higher odds, while female sex and formal school enrollment were associated with lower odds. Kono showed elevated trafficking indicators relative to Kenema in grouped-binomial and child-level models. Findings suggest that child trafficking indicators in Eastern Sierra Leone are patterned by household, child, and district context, and are not fully explained by subjective economic strain. Prevention strategies should move beyond a simple poverty-only framework and integrate school access, support for orphaned and out-of-school children, and place-based responses in higher-risk districts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.