ArticlePloS one2026
Codon-aware multi-scale feature fusion for metagenomic sequence classification.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microorganisms exert profound influences on both natural ecosystems and human society. As the cornerstone of microbial research, metagenomics relies on the precise analysis of large-scale, multi-source genomic data. However, discriminating among diverse sequence types remains a formidable challenge. To address this, we present CamFi (Codon-aware Multi-scale Feature Fusion), a unified framework integrating overlapping nucleotide-triplet representations with multi-scale dilated convolutions for classifying prokaryotic chromosomes, eukaryotic chromosomes, plasmids, and viruses. Benchmark evaluations demonstrate strong mean F1 scores of 97.70% for eukaryotic chromosomes and 94.13% for plasmids. On the CAMI II marine dataset, CamFi achieved a weighted F1 of 82.65%, ranking second among six methods based on reported aggregate metrics. In a balanced four-class benchmark, CamFi attained a macro-F1 of 93.77%, compared with DeepMicroClass (90.03%) and the XGBoost stage of 4CAC (64.66%). These results establish CamFi as a competitive approach for unified metagenomic contig classification under the evaluated conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.