ArticlePloS one2026
An assessment of the health system's capacity for major structural birth defects care in Tanzania using anorectal malformations as a tracer condition: A multi-phase, mixed-methods study protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStructural birth defects cause disproportionate neonatal and under-five morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries, where 90-95% of births and associated deaths occur; however, health-system readiness for prevention uptake, early detection, and management remains poorly understood. Anorectal malformations account for 33-40% of the paediatric surgical workload in sub-Saharan Africa, making it a tracer condition for evaluating Tanzania's capacity across primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention levels. Although delayed detection, high postoperative morbidity, and referral dysfunction are documented, the upstream preconception, antenatal, delivery, and postnatal profile, parental lived experience, external benchmarking of paediatric surgical capacity, and feasibility of a context-specific preoperative checklist remain to be quantified within the Tanzanian clinical environment.
methodsThis multi-phase mixed-methods protocol comprises four phases. In Phase I, all mother-newborn dyads where the infant has an anorectal malformation presenting to Muhimbili National Hospital will be enrolled in a cross-sectional study quantifying preconception, antenatal, delivery, and postnatal prevention uptake; multivariable logistic regression will identify predictors of early detection; the sample size will be derived via Cochran's formula using finite population correction. Phase II will use descriptive phenomenology through purposive in-depth interviews with parents exploring socio-cultural access determinants, analysed via the Stevick-Colaizzi-Keen method. Phase III will conduct a facility-level survey against the Optimal Resources for Children's Surgery checklist at four tertiary hospitals; domain-specific and total compliance scores will be calculated, gaps quantified against benchmarks, and centres compared using Friedman tests and chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Phase IV will test feasibility of a preoperative anorectal malformation checklist at Muhimbili National Hospital, examining practicality and acceptability (non-parametric comparisons). DISCUSSION: This study will produce a system-level appraisal of Tanzania's capacity to prevent, detect, and manage major structural birth defects using anorectal malformation as a tracer condition. Findings will inform policy, guide resource allocation, and support targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.