Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42832462›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

Implementation of electronic signposting to interventions that prevent cancer: A realist review.

Tracey J Brown, Natalie An Qi Tham, Felix Naughton, Henry Goodfellow, Louise Hull, Helena Jopling, Helen M Parretti, Alex T Ramsey, Adam P Wagner, Zarnie Khadjesari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tracey J BrownSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4381-5974
Natalie An Qi ThamSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England.
Felix NaughtonSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England.
Henry GoodfellowPrimary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, England.
Louise HullLeicester Diabetes Centre, The University of Leicester, Leicester, England.
Helena JoplingDepartment of Public Health, West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Bury St. Edmunds, England.
Helen M ParrettiNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England.
Alex T RamseyDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Adam P WagnerNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9101-3477
Zarnie KhadjesariSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2958-9555

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uptake of evidence-based interventions that prevent cancer is very low. Electronic signposting using digital messages sent via electronic healthcare systems is increasingly utilised to improve service reach and uptake. However, theory for optimising the implementation of electronic signposting to cancer prevention interventions is lacking. We sought to generate a novel programme theory to illuminate what type of electronic signposting works, for whom and in what circumstances. A realist review, informed by Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES I), was conducted. Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, ERIC and AMED databases, and grey literature were searched. Studies that contributed information on context and mechanisms of action for electronic signposting to cancer prevention interventions for adults in any healthcare setting were included. Studies were assessed for quality based on relevance, richness and rigour. Realist synthesis and input from stakeholders, including patients, was used to aid development of our novel programme theory. Thirty studies were included, 26 of which were conducted in the United States. 57 individual context-mechanism-outcome configurations were identified. For patients, memorable messages using wording tailored to patient characteristics, and use of a popular communication channel (e.g., SMS text) improved 'buy-in' and usability. For providers, a good fit with organisational priorities, workflow, and establishing compatibility with existing technical systems was important. Increasing optimism of technology and ensuring electronic signposting did not risk existing patient-provider relationships were also key to success. To reduce cancer and cancer disparities, policymakers and providers need to implement electronic signposting in ways that promote 'buy-in', ensure perceived usability, and nurture positive attitudes towards technology. The field would benefit from further qualitative insight, health economic analysis, exploration of equity and long-term outcomes, and research in non-USA contexts. Protocol registration: PROSPERO [CRD42024586907].

Identifiers

PMID42832462
PMCPMC13637878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.