ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Implementation of electronic signposting to interventions that prevent cancer: A realist review.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mapping the Behavioral Weight Management Ecosystem in the East of England to Inform the Implementation of Electronic Signposting.Obesity science & practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uptake of evidence-based interventions that prevent cancer is very low. Electronic signposting using digital messages sent via electronic healthcare systems is increasingly utilised to improve service reach and uptake. However, theory for optimising the implementation of electronic signposting to cancer prevention interventions is lacking. We sought to generate a novel programme theory to illuminate what type of electronic signposting works, for whom and in what circumstances. A realist review, informed by Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES I), was conducted. Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, ERIC and AMED databases, and grey literature were searched. Studies that contributed information on context and mechanisms of action for electronic signposting to cancer prevention interventions for adults in any healthcare setting were included. Studies were assessed for quality based on relevance, richness and rigour. Realist synthesis and input from stakeholders, including patients, was used to aid development of our novel programme theory. Thirty studies were included, 26 of which were conducted in the United States. 57 individual context-mechanism-outcome configurations were identified. For patients, memorable messages using wording tailored to patient characteristics, and use of a popular communication channel (e.g., SMS text) improved 'buy-in' and usability. For providers, a good fit with organisational priorities, workflow, and establishing compatibility with existing technical systems was important. Increasing optimism of technology and ensuring electronic signposting did not risk existing patient-provider relationships were also key to success. To reduce cancer and cancer disparities, policymakers and providers need to implement electronic signposting in ways that promote 'buy-in', ensure perceived usability, and nurture positive attitudes towards technology. The field would benefit from further qualitative insight, health economic analysis, exploration of equity and long-term outcomes, and research in non-USA contexts. Protocol registration: PROSPERO [CRD42024586907].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.