Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42832419›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2026

Why are some neurons spared in neurodegeneration? Cellular subtype identity maintenance as a candidate threshold-setting mechanism.

Dong Won Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dong Won KimDanish Research Institute of Translational Neuroscience (DANDRITE), Nordic EMBL Partnership for Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8624-0168

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases often damage some neuronal populations while sparing closely related neighbors. But instead of asking why some neurons die, should we be asking why some survive? This Essay proposes that a neuron's capacity to sustain the gene-regulatory machinery that maintains its subtype identity helps set the stress threshold beyond which recovery fails. The initiating insult may be metabolic, proteostatic, inflammatory, or arise from the surrounding tissue, but it is the cell's capacity for maintenance that will determine where the tipping point lies: above a critical level, the identity program recovers, whereas below it, regulatory loss becomes self-sustaining. Such a framing could have implications for how neuronal vulnerability to neurodegeneration is understood.

Indexed as

Nerve DegenerationNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeuronsAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID42832419
PMCPMC13637871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.