ArticlePloS one2026
The referral trajectories for young people with depression in low-resource settings: A qualitative study from Ghana and Zimbabwe.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnlike in psychiatric disorders such as psychosis where treatment trajectories are well defined, little is known about pathways to care for depression which is increasingly prevalent among young people across the globe. Whilst empirical evidence is slowly becoming available on pathways to care for common mental disorders in the general population in Ghana and Zimbabwe, there is no study that specifically considered treatment pathways for young people.
objectivesThis study explored trajectories used by young people (15-24 years) to access specialised mental healthcare in order to determine referral pathways for depression in Ghana and Zimbabwe. METHODOLOGY: This sub-analysis forms part of a larger formative, exploratory, descriptive qualitative study conducted within the Youth in Mind consortium. The study engaged 172 participants including young people, healthcare providers, policymakers, faith-based and traditional healers, lay health workers, and school staff across Ghana (N = 105) and Zimbabwe (N = 67) who were sampled purposively and using snowball techniques until saturation was reached. Data were analysed using an iterative combination of inductive and deductive coding, followed by thematic analysis.
resultsDiagnostic and treatment trajectory for young people's access to specialized mental healthcare are complex in both Ghana and Zimbabwe and punctuated with several barriers that culminate in delayed access to treatments. Chief among the barriers facing young people are the catastrophic costs linked with accessing specialized mental health care, lack of autonomy of the youth, long waiting times perpetuated by a limited number of specialists and stigma. Opportunities for optimising access included the use of referral cards, which sped up the referral process, improved communication among referring agents, and establishment of youth corners in some hospitals in Zimbabwe to address concerns of privacy.
conclusionThe findings highlight that pathways to specialised mental healthcare in Ghana and Zimbabwe are inherently complex, hindered by intersecting structural, financial, and social barriers. To mitigate these challenges, a multi-faceted strategy is essential. This should include systemic interventions such as task-shifting, the implementation of streamlined referral tools, dedicated youth-friendly services, and concerted efforts to reduce stigma and costs, thereby fostering more equitable and timely access to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.