Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42832237›Full record

ArticleJAMA neurology2026

Earlier Disclosure of Blood-Based Biomarkers, Diagnostic Certainty, and Clinical Management: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Isabel Estragués-Gázquez, José Contador, Leidy Dayana Martínez, Aida Fernández-Lebrero, Greta García-Escobar, Irene Navalpotro-Gómez, Oriol Grau-Rivera, Gianmarco Iaccarino, Rosa Maria Manero-Borràs, Paula Ortiz-Romero and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06246019 (The Clinical Impact of the Novel Alzheimer's Blood-based Biomarkers), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06246019 unknown statusnot on this map

The Clinical Impact of the Novel Alzheimer's Blood-based Biomarkers: the PLASMAR Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHospital del Mar Research Institute (IMIM)Ran2024 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsAlzheimer Disease, Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, Neurodegenerative DiseasesArmsEarly adoption of blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Isabel Estragués-GázquezBarcelona Brain Health Center, Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
José ContadorBarcelona Brain Health Center, Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Leidy Dayana MartínezBarcelona Brain Health Center, Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Aida Fernández-LebreroBarcelona Brain Health Center, Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Greta García-EscobarBarcelona Brain Health Center, Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Irene Navalpotro-GómezBarcelona Brain Health Center, Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Oriol Grau-RiveraBarcelona Brain Health Center, Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Gianmarco IaccarinoBarcelona Brain Health Center, Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Rosa Maria Manero-BorràsBarcelona Brain Health Center, Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Paula Ortiz-RomeroBarcelona Brain Health Center, Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Felipe Hernández-VillamizarBarcelona Brain Health Center, Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Javier Torres-TorronterasBarcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.
Marina de Diego-OsabaBarcelona Brain Health Center, Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Helena Blasco-ForniésBarcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.
Esther Jiménez-MoyanoBarcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.
Juan José HernándezLaboratori de Referència de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna PadrósLaboratori de Referència de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta Del CampoBarcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.
Albert Puig-PijoanBarcelona Brain Health Center, Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Marc Suárez-CalvetBarcelona Brain Health Center, Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Blood-based biomarkers show high performance for detecting Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology, but evidence on their impact on diagnostic certainty, clinical management, and emotional outcomes in routine care is limited. Objective: To determine whether earlier disclosure of plasma phosphorylated tau at threonine 217 (p-tau217) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) increases etiologic diagnostic certainty, influences clinical management, and affects emotional outcomes in individuals evaluated for cognitive symptoms. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prospective randomized clinical trial conducted at a single memory clinic in Spain between February and October 2024, with 9 months of follow-up. Consecutive new outpatients with subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or mild dementia without a prior etiologic diagnosis were enrolled. Of 265 eligible participants, 220 were randomized to earlier disclosure of blood-based biomarkers at the 3-month visit or delayed disclosure at the 9-month visit. Intervention: Disclosure of blood-based biomarkers for AD pathology (p-tau217) and neurodegeneration (NfL) to the treating neurologist and participant, alongside standard clinical evaluation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of participants achieving a very high-confidence etiologic diagnosis (≥90%). Secondary outcomes included changes in clinical management and emotional outcomes (anxiety, depression, perceived stress, and quality of life). Results: Among the 220 randomized participants (median [IQR] age, 73 [68-78] years; 123 [55.9%] women), baseline diagnoses were SCD (100 [45.5%]), MCI (68 [30.9%]), and mild dementia (52 [23.6%]). At 3 months, a very high-confidence etiologic diagnosis was achieved in 56 of 112 participants in the earlier-disclosure arm (50.0%) compared with 5 of 108 in the delayed-disclosure arm (4.6%) (P < .001). Diagnostic certainty converged after disclosure in both arms, except among participants with MCI, in whom higher certainty persisted in the earlier-disclosure arm. Earlier disclosure was associated with more frequent initiation of symptomatic AD treatment (16/112 [14.3%] vs 5/108 [4.6%]; difference, 9.7; 95% CI, 1.8 to 17.8; P = .01), fewer planned follow-up neuropsychological reassessments for diagnostic clarification (34/112 [30.4%] vs 57/108 [52.8%]; difference, -22.4; 95% CI, -34.4 to -9.4; P < .001), and more planned discharge from the memory clinic to primary care (35/112 [31.3%] vs 13/108 [12.0%]; difference, 19.2; 95% CI, 8.4 to 29.5; P < .001). Earlier disclosure was not associated with worse emotional outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, earlier disclosure of blood-based biomarkers increased etiologic diagnostic certainty and led to earlier, targeted clinical management without increasing emotional distress. These findings support the integration of blood-based biomarkers into memory clinic diagnostic pathways. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06246019.

Identifiers

PMID42832237
PMCPMC13639800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.