ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2026
Comparative Therapeutic Effects of Cytokine-Rich Serum and Platelet-Rich Plasma in a Rat Model of Ovarian Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.
Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate and compare the protective effects of cytokine-rich serum (ACRS) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) against ovarian ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in a rat model of ovarian torsion and detorsion. Forty-two female Wistar albino rats were randomly allocated into control, PRP, ACRS, I/R, I/R + PRP, I/R+ACRS, and donor groups. Ovarian torsion was induced for two hours followed by detorsion. PRP or ACRS was administered following detorsion. Ovarian tissues were evaluated using histopathological assessment, follicle counting, and immunohistochemical analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), cleaved Caspase-3, VEGFA, and α-SMA. Ischemia-reperfusion injury resulted in marked ovarian damage, characterized by increased follicular degeneration, congestion, hemorrhage, edema, stromal connective tissue changes, inflammatory cell infiltration, and elevated apoptotic activity. Both PRP and ACRS attenuated histopathological injury and apoptotic activity while improving follicular preservation. Compared with PRP, ACRS was associated with better preservation of primordial and tertiary follicles, fewer atretic follicles, higher AMH immunoreactivity, lower cleaved Caspase-3 immunoreactivity, and increased VEGFA immunoreactivity. No significant differences were observed in α-SMA immunoreactivity among groups. Both PRP and ACRS exert protective effects against ovarian I/R injury; however, ACRS was associated with more pronounced histological and molecular benefits. These findings suggest that ACRS may represent a promising biological approach in ischemic ovarian pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42832179What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.