ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026
Automated placement of the bolus-tracking region of interest using U-Net-based aortic root segmentation in coronary CT angiography.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In coronary CT angiography (CCTA), deviation of the bolus-tracking region of interest (ROI) from the aortic root (AR) during CT fluoroscopy may lead to inappropriate scan timing. This study developed and evaluated an automated ROI placement system based on the U-Net segmentation of the AR in CT fluoroscopic images. A total of 1663 CT fluoroscopic images from 57 patients who underwent CCTA were analyzed. A patient-level five-fold cross-validation was performed; in each iteration, one fold was used for testing, one for validation, and the remaining three for training. The training images were augmented by rotation. A 2D U-Net was trained to segment the AR region, and postprocessing consisted of Otsu thresholding, median filtering, and connected-component analysis. A circular ROI corresponding to 25% of the predicted AR area was placed at the centroid of the predicted AR region. Segmentation accuracy was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and ROI placement accuracy was evaluated using centroid distance between the predicted and ground-truth regions and complete containment of the ROI mask within the ground-truth AR region. The median DSC was 0.957, and the median centroid distance was 0.7 mm. All automatically placed ROIs were completely contained within the ground-truth AR region. The U-Net inference time was 72.55 ± 15.72 ms per image, and the total processing time from image loading to ROI placement was 94.8 ± 14.6 ms per image. The proposed method can enable accurate, real-time, and operator-independent dynamic ROI placement for CCTA bolus tracking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42832173What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.