ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Limited Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in ALK-Positive Stage II-III Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter CReGYT-03 ALK Study.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
49 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlectinib was approved in 2024 as an adjuvant therapy for resected ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on the ALINA trial. However, the role of cytotoxic adjuvant chemotherapy in this molecular subset remains uncertain. We evaluated the prognostic impact of cytotoxic adjuvant chemotherapy according to ALK status in patients with stage II-III lung adenocarcinoma.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 793 patients with pathologic stage II -III lung adenocarcinoma without EGFR mutations who underwent complete resection at 27 Japanese institutions. After propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), we compared survival outcomes between the patients who received and did not receive cytotoxic adjuvant chemotherapy in the unadjusted cohort. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR) were assessed.
resultsIn ALK-negative disease, cytotoxic adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved RFS, OS, and CIR, both before and after PSM (unadjusted: RFS hazard ratio [HR] 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.81; OS HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.43-0.71; CIR HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.61-0.90); similar favorable trends were observed after IPTW adjustment. Conversely, in ALK-positive disease, only OS showed a significant improvement in the unadjusted analysis (HR 0.19; 95% CI 0.04-0.81), whereas RFS and CIR did not differ significantly. After PSM and IPTW adjustment, similar overall trends were observed.
conclusionsThe prognostic impact of cytotoxic adjuvant chemotherapy differed by ALK status, suggesting limited efficacy in ALK-positive adenocarcinoma and supporting tailored postoperative strategies for this subset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42832145What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.