Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42832132›Full record

ArticleCJEM2026

Clinical applications of gastric point-of-care ultrasound in adult emergency and critical care: a scoping review.

Saad Razzaq, Zlatitsa Todorova, Rami Hamoudeh, Malick Turenne, Emily R Martin, Aurgho Datta, Astha Chandra, Joel Turner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in CJEM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Saad RazzaqDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Ottawa University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Saad.razzaq@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5021-9181
Zlatitsa TodorovaDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Rami HamoudehDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Malick TurenneDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Emily R MartinDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Aurgho DattaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Astha ChandraDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Joel TurnerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPoint-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) is a cornerstone of bedside assessment in emergency and critical care, providing rapid, radiation-free visualization of anatomy and pathology. Gastric PoCUS offers a non-invasive method to assess gastric content, volume, and motility, informing management of aspiration risk, airway interventions, and enteral feeding. Despite supporting evidence, its use remains limited and poorly standardized. The objective of this scoping review is to map the clinical applications of gastric PoCUS in adult emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

methodsA scoping review was conducted according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, CINAHL, were searched from 1950 to May 2025 for studies evaluating gastric ultrasound in adult ED or ICU populations. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted, and charted data.

resultsThirty-five studies met inclusion criteria. Clinical applications of gastric PoCUS among ED and ICU were clustered under three domains: aspiration risk assessment and airway management (n = 5); enteral nutrition and gastric residual volume monitoring (n = 12); and diagnostic evaluation or therapeutic monitoring (n = 18). Across studies, gastric PoCUS reliably differentiated gastric content types, estimated gastric volume, and informed airway and feeding decisions. In diagnostic contexts, gastric PoCUS enabled rapid bedside identification of gastric outlet obstruction, volvulus, intramural hematoma, and perforated viscus. No studies reported complications or harm caused by performing gastric PoCUS.

conclusionsGastric PoCUS is a versatile bedside tool bridging diagnostic and therapeutic domains in emergency and critical care. It enhances patient safety, optimizes nutritional management, and reduces radiographic dependence. Standardization of scanning protocols, structured training, and multicenter outcome-based validation studies are needed to support routine integration in acute care.

Indexed as

Aspiration risk assessmentCritical careEmergency medicineEnteral nutrition monitoringGastric point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS)Gastric residual volume estimation

Identifiers

PMID42832132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.