Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42832102›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2026

Engineering the geriatric heart to model HFpEF.

Sebastian Bass-Stringer, Jarmon G Lees, Shiang Y Lim

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sebastian Bass-StringerSt Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, 9 Princes Street, Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065, Australia.
Jarmon G LeesSt Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, 9 Princes Street, Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065, Australia.
Shiang Y LimSt Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, 9 Princes Street, Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065, Australia. mlim@svi.edi.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) clinical trials suffer from high rates of attrition due to a biological mismatch between preclinical models and patients. While clinical HFpEF is fundamentally driven by advanced age, female sex, systemic inflammation, and progressive myocardial stiffness, preclinical screening still relies predominantly on young male rodents or foetal-like pluripotent stem cell derivatives. In this perspective, we propose a modular and testable geriatric engineering framework for reconstructing the myocardial features of this disease in vitro. The framework integrates four pathogenic drivers: inducible nuclear senescence to mimic ageing-like phenotypes, post-menopausal estrogen withdrawal, programmable biomaterial-driven stiffness, and macrophage-mediated immune activation. De-risking HFpEF drug development requires deliberately engineering this target pathophysiology, ensuring candidate compounds are evaluated against the biology of the ageing myocardium. Because such platforms isolate myocardial phenotypes from the broader multisystem clinical syndrome, we outline the strict model inputs, functional outputs, and clinical benchmarking criteria required to establish their translational validity.

Indexed as

AgingHeart FailureStroke VolumeAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansMyocytes, CardiacAccelerated ageingDisease modellingHFpEFiPSC-derived cardiomyocytesSexual dimorphism.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.