ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Population-specific validation of the distal root canal width method for forensic age estimation in a Spanish sample.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forensic age estimation in living individuals is essential in legal and migratory contexts, particularly when assessing whether an individual has reached the age of majority. The method proposed by Roberts et al. evaluates the relative distal root canal width (RCW) of mandibular molars, a parameter measurable only after complete apical closure. This method has not yet been validated in a Spanish population, making its regional evaluation essential due to known population-specific variations in dental maturation. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 576 digital orthopantomographs of individuals aged 16-24 years presenting with complete apical closure of the mandibular molars LL6, LL7, and LL8. Distal root canal patterns were classified into categories A, B, C, and U. Intra- and inter-observer agreements, association with legal adulthood, diagnostic accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic curves were evaluated. Reproducibility was high (kappa > 0.80). Category RCW-C was the only pattern significantly associated with legal adulthood (odds ratio = 2.58; p = 0.006), showing high specificity (84.6%) and positive predictive value (94.2%), but low sensitivity (31.9%). Area under the curve values ranged from 0.665 in males to 0.616 in females, indicating modest discriminative performance. In conclusion, RCW-C is a specific and reproducible indicator associated with legal adulthood in individuals with fully developed mandibular molars. However, its limited sensitivity underscores that the method should be used only as a complementary tool within a multimodal forensic age estimation protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42832073What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.