Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42832054›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of urology2026

The effect of ureteral stenting on the risk of metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma in patients with bladder tumors involving the ureteral orifice.

Nikolaos Pyrgidis, Patrick Engelmann, Daniel Puhr-Westerheide, Benedikt Ebner, Marc Kidess, Marie Semmler, Patrick Keller, Christian Stief, Gerald Bastian Schulz, Yannic Volz

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nikolaos PyrgidisDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Patrick EngelmannDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Daniel Puhr-WesterheideDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Benedikt EbnerDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Marc KidessDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Marie SemmlerDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Patrick KellerDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Christian StiefDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Gerald Bastian SchulzDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Yannic VolzDepartment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. yannic.volz@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5468-9398

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUreteral stenting in patients with bladder cancer involving the ureteral orifice may increase the rate of metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Nevertheless, evidence on the matter is scarce and often contradictory. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed an observational study comparing ureteral stenting versus no stenting with respect to the risk of developing metachronous UTUC in patients who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) involving the ureteral orifice between January 2015 and December 2024. We performed time-to-event analyses to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsWe included 151 patients with a median age of 73 years. 37 (25%) underwent ureteral stenting during TURBT. Patients undergoing stenting had higher BMI (p = 0.014), more aggressive tumors (p = 0.003), underwent prior intravesical therapy more often (p = 0.008), higher preoperative creatinine values (p = 0.007), and longer hospitalization duration (p = 0.002) compared to those who did not undergo stenting. After a median follow-up of 25 months, 8 patients developed metachronous UTUC (2 in the stenting group and 6 in the non-stenting group). Ureteral stenting was not associated with statistically significantly higher rates of metachronous UTUC (HR: 1.2, 95%CI: 0.31-5.6, p > 0.9). During follow-up, 49 (33%) patients developed recurrence in the bladder, 43 (28%) underwent cystectomy, and 24 (16%) died. The HRs did not significantly differ between the two groups.

conclusionsThe present study did not demonstrate an increased risk of metachronous UTUC after stenting during TURBT with urothelial cancer involving the ureteral orifice. Moreover, stenting was not statistically significantly associated with increased recurrences in the urinary bladder, higher cystectomy rates, or worse mortality.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellKidney NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Second PrimaryStentsUreterUreteral NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTransurethral Resection of BladderHydronephrosisTURBTUpper tract urothelial cell carcinomaUreteral stentUrothelial cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID42832054
PMCPMC13638760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.