Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42832023›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

A match made in mental space: Alignment between target skew and cue organization influences recall of attribute values.

Patrik Sörqvist, Emil Skog, Alice Mason, John E Marsh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrik SörqvistDepartment of Health, Learning and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Laboratorievägen 14, 971 87, Luleå, Sweden. patrik.sorqvist@ltu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7584-2275
Emil SkogDepartment of Health, Learning and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Laboratorievägen 14, 971 87, Luleå, Sweden.
Alice MasonDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
John E MarshDepartment of Health, Learning and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Laboratorievägen 14, 971 87, Luleå, Sweden.

Funding

Kempestiftelserna JCSMK23-0179Magnus Bergvalls Stiftelse 2025-235Riksbankens Jubileumsfond P23-0067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recall is often more successful for items from sparse (distinct) regions and less successful from dense (less distinct) regions in memory space. We propose that retrieval cues are also organized into crowded and less crowded regions depending on distinctiveness, and that successful retrieval depends on the distributional match between the organization of targets and cues. As a real-world test case, we used the labels from the European Union's old (A+++, A++, A+, A, B, C, D) and new (A, B, C, D, E, F, G) energy-label scale as cues for memory retrieval of appliances' kilowatt-hour (kWh) values. In a preregistered experiment, participants rated seven refrigerators, while studying associated kWh values drawn from a positive, a negative, or a non-skewed distribution. Ratings confirmed that the labels of the old scale were psychologically skewed in mental space whereas the new scale had a more linear organization. After a brief filled delay, labels served as retrieval cues for kWh recall. Analyses of recall patterns, complemented by analyses of recall error, showed that the linear cue scale yielded recalled values that were closer to the correct kWh values when target values were non-skewed, but recalled values were overly linear when targets were skewed. Conversely, recall was most successful with the skewed cue scale when target values were positively skewed. These findings suggest that retrieval cues constrain reconstruction by imposing a distributional structure on target representations, and that recall is most successful when this structure aligns with the organization of encoded values in mental space.

Indexed as

CuesMental RecallAdultHumansYoung AdultComparison-induced distortion theoryCue-based biasDecision-makingDensityDistinctivenessMemory

Identifiers

PMID42832023
PMCPMC13638717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.