Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42832006›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2026

Weighting of Spectral and Temporal Cues with n-of-m Cochlear Implant Strategies Depends on Voice Pitch.

Floris Rotteveel, Bert Maat, Chris J James, Damir Kovačić, Lina A J Reiss, Deniz Başkent, Etienne Gaudrain

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Floris RotteveelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. f.rotteveel@rug.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2955-5953
Bert MaatDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Chris J JamesCochlear France SAS, Toulouse, France.
Damir KovačićFaculty of Science, University of Split, Split, Croatia.
Lina A J ReissDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Oregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Deniz BaşkentDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Etienne GaudrainLyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS UMR5292, Inserm U1028, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-10-LABX-0060Ministry of Science and Technology, Croatia DIGIT.1.2.03.019Netherlands Organization for International Cooperation in Higher Education 918-17-603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues to voice pitch perception in cochlear implant (CI) users remain unclear. This study aimed to directly quantify these contributions in dynamic speech stimuli with clinical n-of-m processors.

methodsFundamental frequency (F0) discrimination was measured using consonant-vowel triplets in two experiments. Sixteen (eight female) postlingually deaf adult CI users with n-of-m strategies participated in experiment 1 (F0 range 76-242 Hz). Five (three female) also participated in experiment 2 (F0 range 242-768 Hz). Stimuli were presented acoustically or via direct stimulation. For the latter, pulse patterns were recorded in advance using the participants' own settings and modified to suppress temporal or spectral cues.

resultsIn experiment 1, temporal suppression drastically decreased F0 discrimination. Spectral suppression decreased the F0 discrimination of only some participants, while spectral and temporal suppression combined decreased performance further. Conversely, in experiment 2, spectral suppression caused a drop in F0 discrimination while temporal suppression had no effect. Analysis of the unaltered stimuli showed that with increasing F0, temporal cues decreased and spectral cues increased in availability.

conclusionThe novel prerecording and streaming method effectively combines realistic stimulation patterns with precise control at the pulse level. Our results indicate that in voice pitch discrimination, postlingually deafened adult CI users rely predominantly on the most available cue, which depends on the F0. Temporal cues dominate when discriminating F0s within the typical male to female voice range, while spectral cues tend to dominate within the typical female to child voice range.

Indexed as

Cochlear implantsPsychophysicsSpectralTemporalVoice pitch

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.