ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026
Preoperative pulse rate variability and the hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation: a retrospective secondary analysis.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individual hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation vary considerably. We examined whether preoperative pulse rate variability (PRV), a photoplethysmography-derived surrogate of heart rate variability, is associated with this response. In this retrospective secondary analysis, 183 adults undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were analyzed. A 3-min photoplethysmogram was recorded in the supine, resting, unsedated state immediately before induction, and time-domain (mean pulse-to-pulse interval [mean PPI], RMSSD, and pNN50) and frequency-domain (LF power, HF power, and LF/HF) PRV indices were computed. A hemodynamic response was defined as a systolic blood pressure rise >15 mmHg, or a heart rate rise to >90 beats/min or by >30% (≥ 10% if baseline ≥90 beats/min); patients were classified as response-present or response-absent. Of 183 patients, 101 (55.2%) were response-present and 82 (44.8%) response-absent. LF/HF was higher in the response-present group (1.84 [1.32-2.60] vs 1.37 [0.78-2.44]; unadjusted P = 0.018), but no index remained significant after correction for multiple comparisons (LF/HF adjusted P = 0.109; all others adjusted P ≥ 0.301). Discrimination was limited (AUC 0.602; 95% CI 0.518-0.684). In a sensitivity analysis using a blood-pressure-only response definition, no PRV index differed significantly. After correction for multiple comparisons, no preoperative PRV index differed significantly between patients with and without a hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. LF/HF was higher in the response-present group before correction, but the effect size was small and the discriminative performance limited. These findings do not support preoperative PRV for identifying patients at risk and are hypothesis-generating only. Trial Registration number: KCT0005840.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42832003What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.