ReviewJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026
Beyond processed depth targets: frontal EEG patterns, brain vulnerability, and postoperative delirium in older adults.
Review in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Limited-channel frontal electroencephalography is widely used during anesthesia through processed EEG platforms, but clinical interpretation often remains centered on numerical depth indices. This narrative review examines whether frontal EEG signals, including raw waveforms, suppression behavior, spectral features, and processed index behavior, may provide information beyond hypnotic depth in older adults at risk for postoperative delirium. A targeted literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar for articles published from database inception through April 30, 2026. Priority was given to randomized trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, consensus statements, prospective observational studies, and mechanistic studies relevant to processed EEG monitoring, frontal EEG interpretation, postoperative delirium, aging, frailty, anesthesia, and critical care. Evidence from randomized trials and systematic reviews suggests that processed EEG-guided anesthetic titration and suppression minimization alone do not reliably prevent postoperative delirium. However, several clinically accessible frontal EEG patterns may provide contextual information about anesthetic sensitivity and reduced cerebral reserve. These include reduced frontal alpha power, early or disproportionate burst suppression, spectral slowing or low spectral edge frequency, and disorganized emergence. Their interpretation depends on anesthetic dose and agent, hemodynamics, signal quality, artifact burden, frailty, baseline cognition, and postoperative recovery context. Limited-channel frontal EEG should be interpreted as a contextual brain-monitoring signal rather than a single-number depth target. Future studies should test whether multimodal frameworks integrating frontal EEG patterns with physiologic and patient-level variables improve postoperative neurocognitive outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42832002What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.