ArticleIrish journal of medical science2026
Follow-up pathways, investigation utilisation, and general practitioner communication following acute medical unit assessment: A six-month retrospective service evaluation.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute Medical Units (AMUs) provide rapid assessment of acute medical presentations between the Emergency Department and inpatient services. Communication with general practitioners (GPs) at discharge underpins continuity of care, yet post-discharge processes within AMU ambulatory pathways are seldom evaluated.
aimsTo evaluate patient flow, structured follow-up arrangements, outpatient investigation use, and documented discharge communication to GPs across the acute assessment and hot clinic pathways of an AMU service.
methodsRetrospective service evaluation of 734 patient episodes (493 acute assessment; 241 hot clinic) over six months (October 2023-March 2024) at a Model 4 Irish tertiary hospital. Variables were extracted from routinely maintained AMU service records and analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 22, with chi-square testing for between-pathway comparisons.
resultsNeurology was the commonest clinical category in both cohorts (232/493 [47.1%] acute; 71/241 [29.5%] hot clinic). Following acute assessment, 243/493 (49.3%) continued under AMU follow-up and 53/493 (10.8%) were admitted; in the hot clinic cohort, 125/241 (51.9%) continued under AMU follow-up and 10/241 (4.1%) were admitted. Follow-up completion was high (440/493 [89.2%]; 213/241 [88.4%]). Documented GP discharge communication among discharge-eligible episodes was low, and significantly lower in the hot clinic pathway (184/437 [42.1%] vs 47/231 [20.3%]; p < 0.001).
conclusionsAMU ambulatory pathways achieved high follow-up completion and low admission rates, but documented discharge communication to general practice was poor, particularly in the hot clinic pathway. Integrating hot clinic encounters into electronic discharge workflows is a priority for quality improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42832000What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.