ReviewJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026
A critical appraisal of structure-based virtual screening, binding free energy methods, and AI-driven molecular design across the evolving computational landscape of drug discovery.
Review in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structure-based drug design rests on the physical chemistry of molecular recognition, and every computational advance represents a successive attempt to capture that reality with greater fidelity and at greater scale. This review examines that progression through three lenses: the empirical performance of prospective structure-based virtual screening across 419 documented case studies, the accuracy of binding free energy methods, and the capability of generative artificial intelligence to design molecules de novo. Across the surveyed campaigns, the best hit was better than 1 micromolar in 113 of 419 studies. Ensitrelvir, discovered by virtual screening of a proprietary library followed by structure-based optimisation, received emergency regulatory approval in Japan in November 2022 and standard approval in March 2024. Scaling a docking library from 99 million to 1.7 billion compounds against the same target raises the confirmed active rate, but the reported enhancement factor ranges from 1.09-fold to 4.18-fold depending on the activity threshold and selection rule applied, so the direction of the effect is more robust than its magnitude. Extended-sampling free-energy perturbation reduces prediction RMSE to 0.78 kcal/mol, approaching the median reproducibility of the experiments against which such methods are judged. Rentosertib, the first molecule whose target and structure were both generated computationally to reach a randomised trial, met a safety primary endpoint in a 71-patient Phase IIa study; its lung-function findings were secondary and exploratory. The review introduces the Computational-to-Clinical Translation Index as a proof-of-concept reporting framework with an explicit operational specification, and articulates a mechanistically grounded research agenda.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42831991What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.