ArticlePsychological research2026
Knowledge of robotic identity modulates attentional orienting to humanoid robot motion.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As humanoid robots become increasingly integrated into human social environments, understanding how individuals perceive and respond to robotic social cues is critical for advancing research in social cognition. While previous studies have demonstrated that robotic eye gaze can direct human attention, the impact of robotic motion on attentional orienting effects remains unclear. In the present study, we employed point-light displays of humanoid robot walking motion as central cues in a modified cueing paradigm. In Experiment 1, participants were naive to the fact that the observed motion patterns represented a robot, and we observed a cueing congruency effect; however, no significant difference emerged between the upright and inverted conditions. In Experiment 2, participants were explicitly informed participants that the motion depicted a robot, and the cueing effects differed significantly between the upright and inverted conditions specifically at 500 ms. Notably, this effect was significantly correlated with participants' perception of animacy. These findings suggest that while robotic motion has the potential to elicit attentional shifts, its effectiveness is further modulated by participants' conceptual knowledge of the agent and perception of animacy. This underscores the pivotal role of mental attribution in shaping social cognitive responses to artificial agents, offering valuable insights for designing socially interactive robots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42831982What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.