ArticleInfection2026
Asymptomatic bacteriuria in patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors: methodological considerations and clinical implications.
Article in Infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hussain et al. reported a higher prevalence of culture-detected asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) among sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) users than among non-users with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This observation is important but requires cautious interpretation. Culture-detected ASB is distinct from symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI), and evidence from randomized trials and real-world studies has generally not shown a clinically meaningful increase in symptomatic UTI with SGLT2i use. Moreover, the single-time-point assessment cannot distinguish transient, persistent, or incident bacteriuria, and a single voided urine specimen may not confirm ASB in women. Unmeasured differences in background antidiabetic therapy and lower urinary tract risk factors may also have contributed to the observed association. Most importantly, the study did not determine whether detecting ASB predicts clinically significant infection or improves patient-important outcomes. Therefore, the available findings do not support routine urine screening in asymptomatic SGLT2i users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42831981What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.