ArticleClinical drug investigation2026
Cognitive Outcomes After Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and the PRECISE-ACTION Framework for Transdisciplinary Cognitive Management.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPost-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is disabling after acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), but cognitive outcomes after reperfusion therapy remain uncertain because studies differ in treatment pathways, cognitive tools, follow-up timing, and ascertainment.
objectivesTo estimate PSCI prevalence after AIS reperfusion therapy and evaluate comparative cognitive, safety, and functional outcomes.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL from 1 January 2000 to 31 May 2024, with an updated search on 16 June 2026. Random-effects models were used. Risk ratios (RRs) were the primary comparative binary measure; odds ratios (ORs) were sensitivity analyses.
resultsTwenty-eight distinct study records comprising 18,322 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled PSCI prevalence was 33% in treatment-arm analyses (95% CI 14-54%; I
conclusionsPost-stroke cognitive impairment remains frequent after AIS reperfusion therapy, affecting approximately one-third of reperfusion-treated patients and two-fifths of overall or single-arm cohorts. Comparative RR and OR analyses did not show a robust overall association between reperfusion exposure and PSCI risk, while cognitive score differences were significant but heterogeneous. These findings support routine cognitive assessment, harmonised endpoints, and prospective therapy-specific follow-up. PRECISE-ACTION is proposed as a preliminary, hypothesis-generating transdisciplinary framework for structured cognitive assessment, longitudinal tracking, integrated care, and future research. REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework (OSF), 2nbeh.
Identifiers
42831969What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.