ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Predictive modeling of lung cancer subtype with integration of clinical and thoracic imaging features to guide early brain metastasis management.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOptimal treatment for synchronous brain metastases at lung cancer diagnosis depends on subtype, but histologic/molecular profiling is often delayed. We developed machine-learning models using clinical and imaging data to classify lung cancer into three subtypes with distinct brain metastasis treatment implications: small cell lung cancer (SCLC), EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (EGFR+), and EGFR-wild-type non-small cell lung cancer (EGFR-).
methodsWe retrospectively identified patients with metastatic lung cancer diagnosed from 2016 to 2025 at a single institution. Patients without brain metastases at diagnosis formed the training cohort, while patients presenting with synchronous brain metastases formed the testing cohort. Clinical variables and thoracic imaging features from diagnostic chest CT reports were used to train LASSO logistic regression and random forest models, evaluated via AUC and standard diagnostic metrics. Feature contributions were assessed using logistic regression coefficients and random forest permutation importance.
resultsOf 305 patients, 182 were used for training and 123 comprised the testing cohort. Logistic regression achieved AUCs of 0.887, 0.811, and 0.801 for EGFR+, SCLC, and EGFR-, respectively; random forest achieved 0.907, 0.783, and 0.810. Adding imaging features to clinical variables improved prediction for EGFR + and SCLC. Contributory imaging features included fibrosis, emphysema, miliary pattern, cavitation, pleural attachment, and vessel encasement, among others. Three-way prediction showed highest positive predictive value for EGFR + and high negative predictive value for SCLC.
conclusionCombined clinical and chest imaging features can help predict lung cancer subtype, supporting early multidisciplinary discussions for patients with synchronous brain metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.