ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
MASCC oncodermatology clinical practice statement: prevention of acute radiation dermatitis using barrier-forming topical agents.
Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMASCC Clinical Practice Statements (CPS) are practice-oriented resources designed to support clinicians by addressing areas of clinical need where high-quality evidence is limited. They reflect expert consensus on current practices, treatment approaches, and modalities commonly used in oncology care. This CPS aims to provide practical guidance for the prevention of acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) using barrier-forming topical agents.
methodsThis CPS was developed based on a comprehensive review of the literature identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL conducted up to April 23, 2026, followed by structured discussions among experts from the MASCC Oncodermatology Study Group. The findings were synthesized into bullet points to provide a practical guide to optimal standard-of-care practices.
resultsRecommendations were developed to guide patient selection, skin preparation, product choice, application schedule and technique, as well as monitoring when initiating, using, and ceasing when using barrier-forming topical agents for the prevention of ARD, with the best available evidence.
conclusionsBarrier-forming topical agents are recommended for patients undergoing radiotherapy who are at considerable risk of developing high‑grade ARD, particularly in treatment sites with irregular anatomical contours, such as head and neck cancers. Extension to other anatomical subsites may be considered; however, more robust data are required to support their routine use in these settings. Among these agents, StrataXRT currently has the most robust supporting evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42831962What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.