ArticleJournal of community genetics2026
Exploring factors that influence patient satisfaction in genetic counseling: a post-hoc qualitative analysis of perceived empathy by patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in Japan.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient satisfaction is essential for the effective delivery and expansion of genetic counseling services in Japan, yet patients' perspectives remain underexplored. This study examined factors shaping satisfaction with cancer genetic counseling using expectation-disconfirmation theory (EDT), which conceptualizes satisfaction as the interaction between prior expectations and perceived performance, offers a useful framework for understanding these experiences.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with thirteen participants (mean age 48 ± 10 years) diagnosed with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) or with family members affected by HBOC. Data analysis involved inductive thematic analysis followed by conceptual and interpretative analysis within the EDT framework.
resultsTwo themes emerged: (i) expectations of genetic counseling and its perceived usefulness, and (ii) trust in medical staff cultivated through the follow-up process. When counseling met or exceeded expectations, participants recalled empathic care positively, whereas unmet expectations diminished recall of empathic elements. Trust built through sustained interactions contributed to satisfaction regardless of whether expectations were fulfilled. Participants valued repeated, informal encounters -such as conversations during blood draws or frequent check-ins-which conveyed compassion beyond the formal counseling session.
conclusionSatisfaction with genetic counseling is shaped by expectation confirmation or disconfirmation and by trust established through long-term relationships with healthcare providers. While EDT explains part of this process, a complementary framework emphasizing interpersonal care and implicit hospitality may better account for satisfaction in cases of negative disconfirmation. These findings highlight the importance of clear communication regarding the scope of genetic counseling and suggest that integrating opportunities for ongoing patient-provider interactions may enhance genetic service delivery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.