ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2026
Chemsex and childhood trauma: evidence from a explorative matched case-control analysis.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsChemsex refers to the intentional use of illicit psychoactive substances to facilitate or enhance sexual experiences, particularly among men who have sex with men (MSM), and is associated with substantial physical and mental health risks. The relationship between chemsex use and childhood trauma remains insufficiently explored. This study examined differences between chemsex users and an control group in substance use patterns, childhood trauma, and assessed associations between trauma severity and substance use.
methodsIn a matched case-control design, 31 chemsex users and matched controls were assessed. Substance use patterns were investigated using a structured interview based on the checklist of the Amphetamine-Type Stimulants (ATS) Basic Drug Interview, childhood trauma was measured using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). Group differences were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U tests with mean ranks. Associations were tested using Spearman's rank correlation.
resultsChemsex users showed significantly higher rates of substance use across multiple drug classes compared to controls (all p < .016), with odds ratios ranging from 3.9 (amphetamines) to 435.0 (methamphetamine). Childhood trauma differed significantly only for emotional abuse (U = 229.50, p = .020), while no differences were found for other CTQ subscales. No significant correlations emerged between trauma severity and the extend of substance use.
conclusionEmotional abuse may contribute to the development of chemsex-related substance use patterns. Future research should further clarify the etiological specificity of childhood trauma dimensions in chemsex contexts. Beyond minority stress frameworks, additional explanatory models may enhance understanding of chemsex and inform prevention and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42831921What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.