ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2026
Evaluating reaction norm and fixed effect models for genomic selection of end-use quality in wheat.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key messageHistoric breeding program end-use quality data was used to perform genomic selection in two broad frameworks, incorporating fixed effect loci and genotype by environment interactions. Exceptional end-use quality in hexaploid bread wheat is an important factor for selling wheat in the global marketplace. However, many end-use quality traits are time-consuming and expensive to test, meaning their measurement is often delayed until late-stage trials of a breeding program. Genomic selection (GS) is one tool that has been shown to allow for earlier generation improvement of many traits in wheat breeding. Further, advances in GS methods may improve model predictive abilities, such as incorporating known loci that control traits as fixed effects and utilizing single-stage reaction norm models to control for genotype by environment interactions. Therefore, we evaluated conventional methods as well as these two advances to perform GS for twelve important end-use quality traits collected by the Montana State University (MSU) Spring Wheat Breeding Program from 2010-2022 across 842 elite breeding lines. We found that the conventional GS models performed well in 5-fold cross validation with predictive abilities ranging from 0.4-0.7 and in leave-one-year-out validation with most trait-year combinations exceeding a predictive ability threshold of 0.3. We did not observe any difference in predictive ability for the inclusion of fixed effect loci, but we did observe strong within-year correlations for the single-step reaction norm models in both validation methods. We concluded that both conventional, two-step GS and single-step reaction norm GS offer viable methods for earlier generation improvement of major end-use quality traits in the MSU Spring Wheat Breeding Program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.