ArticleRheumatology international2026
Cannabinoids for pain management in rheumatoid arthritis: a scoping review of clinical evidence and mechanisms.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Persistent pain remains a major unmet need in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), even in patients with adequately controlled inflammatory disease. Cannabinoids have been proposed as potential modulators of pain and inflammation, but their clinical role in RA remains uncertain. To map and critically appraise the available clinical evidence on cannabinoid-related interventions or exposures for pain management in adults with RA. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, the Directory of Open Access Journals, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies published from January 1, 1990, to September 10, 2026. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies evaluating cannabinoid-related interventions or exposures in adults with confirmed RA and reporting pain-related outcomes were eligible. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2 for randomized trials and ROBINS-I for observational studies. Of 593 records identified, three studies met the eligibility criteria: one randomized placebo-controlled trial and two observational studies. In the randomized trial of 58 patients, nabiximols reduced pain on movement by 0.95 points (p = 0.044), pain at rest by 1.04 points (p = 0.018), and improved sleep quality by 1.17 points (p = 0.027); DAS28 decreased by 0.76 points (p = 0.002), while no serious adverse events were reported. Observational studies suggested possible symptomatic benefit but were limited by heterogeneous cannabinoid exposure and serious to critical risk of bias. Current clinical evidence remains insufficient to establish the efficacy or long-term safety of cannabinoids for RA-related pain. Larger, rigorously designed trials using standardized cannabinoid formulations and pain-relevant outcomes are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.