Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42831872›Full record

Observational studyCancer research communications2026

Melanoma Recurrence Prediction Using a Tissue-Free Epigenomic Molecular Residual Disease Assay: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study (COSMOS-MEL01).

Kenjiro Namikawa, Dai Ogata, Eiji Nakano, Naoya Yamazaki, Azusa Komada, Akira Takahashi, Shusuke Yoshikawa, Chiemi Notake, Ryuta Mitani, Takayuki Yoshino and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kenjiro NamikawaDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2763-7346
Dai OgataDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1335-7100
Eiji NakanoDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7632-8182
Naoya YamazakiDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9638-0428
Azusa KomadaClinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0000-1462-9211
Akira TakahashiDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9304-7590
Shusuke YoshikawaDepartment of Dermatology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0009-0002-6082-4696
Chiemi NotakeTranslational Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID 0009-0003-1998-7650
Ryuta MitaniTranslational Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID 0009-0007-2132-1232
Takayuki YoshinoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0489-4756
Yoshiaki NakamuraTranslational Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5241-6855

Funding

Guardant Health (Guardant)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent adoption of perioperative therapy for high-risk melanoma, its overall survival (OS) benefit remains unclear, highlighting the need for biomarkers to identify patients likely to benefit from treatment. Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) after definitive treatment predicts recurrence, and emerging molecular residual disease (MRD) assays may influence management. We validated a tissue-free MRD assay in 48 patients with clinical stage II to III melanoma treated with surgery (52% nonacral cutaneous, 31% acral, and 17% mucosal). The assay detects MRD through bioinformatic analysis of methylation signals across >20,000 epigenomic regions. Plasma samples (n = 281; 280 successfully reported) were prospectively collected before surgery, at day 28, and every 3 to 6 months thereafter. Associations among MRD detection, recurrence, and OS were analyzed. At a median follow-up of 34.6 months with 27 recurrence events, postoperative surveillance sensitivity for distant recurrence was 81% with 100% posttreatment specificity. The median lead time between MRD detection and radiographic recurrence was 70.5 days. Surveillance MRD detection was associated with increased recurrence risk [hazard ratio (HR), 26.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.86-246.58; P = 0.004]. Similarly, MRD detection 28 days postoperatively independently predicted recurrence (HR, 11.70; 95% CI, 3.09-43.76; P < 0.001) and death (HR, 31.14; 95% CI, 5.37-221.1; P < 0.001). Tissue-free epigenomic MRD detection was sensitive, specific, and significantly associated with recurrence and melanoma-related death. These findings support the use of this assay in melanoma as a rapid, noninvasive approach for earlier identification of patients at high risk for recurrence, enabling refined treatment and surveillance strategies. SIGNIFICANCE: Prognostic tools for high-risk melanoma rely on baseline factors with limited dynamic risk assessment. A tissue-free MRD assay demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for distant recurrence detection, identifying molecular relapse before radiographic recurrence. Postoperative MRD detection was strongly associated with recurrence and melanoma-related death, enabling refined treatment and surveillance strategies.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAEpigenomicsMelanomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualSkin NeoplasmsAdultAgedDNA MethylationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID42831872
PMCPMC13669714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.