Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42831848›Full record

ArticleJournal of perianesthesia nursing : official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses2026

Beyond the Numerical Rating Scale: Comprehensive Pain Assessment in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit.

La Donna Brown, LaShonda Kelly, Edwin N Aroke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perianesthesia nursing : official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

La Donna BrownCollege of Nursing, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
LaShonda KellySchool of Nursing, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Edwin N ArokeSchool of Nursing, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL. Electronic address: earoke@uab.edu.

Funding

Epigenomic and Gene Expression Signatures of Racial Differences in Chronic Low Back PainR01AR079178 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI AROKE, EDWIN NGOMUEH · 2021 to 2024
$1.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR079178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective pain assessment during the perioperative period is a crucial responsibility for nurses. However, relying solely on numerical rating scales may not fully capture the complexity of postoperative pain experiences. This article offers perioperative nurses evidence-based guidance on comprehensive pain assessment strategies for the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). We review validated subjective tools, such as the numerical rating scale, visual analog scale, verbal rating scale, and Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale, highlighting their psychometric properties and appropriate clinical applications. We also discuss behavioral assessment instruments validated for PACU use, including the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale, the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool, and the Acute Pain Assessment 5, noting their inter-rater reliability and diagnostic accuracy metrics. Additionally, we evaluate emerging objective monitoring technologies (the Surgical Pleth Index, Nociception Level Index, Analgesia Nociception Index, and pupillometry) for their predictive accuracy, potential confounds, and clinical impact. We present strategies for assessing movement-evoked pain and discuss multimodal integration approaches, while acknowledging existing evidence gaps requiring further research. By combining multiple assessment methods with multimodal pain management, we aim to optimize postoperative pain control.

Indexed as

behavioral pain scalesnociception monitoringPACUpain assessmentperioperative nursingpostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID42831848
PMCPMC13660212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.