Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42831818›Full record

ArticleEmotion (Washington, D.C.)2026

Emotional inertia is state-dependent: Capturing asymmetry in resistance to change.

Stefan Schneider, Doerte U Junghaenel, Raymond Hernandez, Arthur A Stone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stefan SchneiderDornsife Center for Self-Report Science, University of Southern California.ORCID 0000-0002-4562-0524
Doerte U JunghaenelDornsife Center for Self-Report Science, University of Southern California.
Raymond HernandezDornsife Center for Self-Report Science, University of Southern California.
Arthur A StoneDornsife Center for Self-Report Science, University of Southern California.

Funding

Advancing the Science and Practice of Ecological Momentary AssessmentR37AG057685 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Arthur A Stone · 2018 to 2026
$9.4M
Testing early markers of cognitive decline and dementia derived from survey response behaviorsR01AG068190 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Doerte Ulrike Junghaenel, Stefan Schneider · 2020 to 2026
$4.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG068190NIA NIH HHS R37 AG057685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotional inertia, the resistance to change in feelings, is a central construct in emotion dynamics. However, standard inertia models rely on a simplified assumption of symmetry: They assume that the temporal carryover of affect is identical regardless of whether an individual is feeling better or worse than usual. This masks potentially critical individual differences, as theories of adaptive affective functioning propose rapid recovery from worsened affective states alongside sustained persistence of desirable affective states as hallmarks of healthy affect regulation. To capture individual differences in this asymmetry, we introduce

Identifiers

PMID42831818
PMCPMC13641155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.