Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42831573›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders

Communication Support and Training for Families Affected by Aphasia: A National Survey Exploring Perspectives of Professionals.

Lisbeth Frølund Kristensen, Lars Evald, Charlotte Overgaard, Dorthe Hansen, Jytte Isaksen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisbeth Frølund KristensenHammel Neurorehabilitation Centre and University Research Clinic, Hammel, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2690-3745
Lars EvaldHammel Neurorehabilitation Centre and University Research Clinic, Hammel, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6255-2562
Charlotte OvergaardThe Unit of Health Promotion, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3370-2338
Dorthe HansenDepartment of Culture and Language, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jytte IsaksenDepartment of Culture and Language, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

Novo Nordisk Foundation NF23OC0083761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAphasia affects both the individuals and their families, impacting communication, social connectedness, roles and mental health. The focus in neurorehabilitation often remains on the individual, yet research suggests that addressing the family as a system would be beneficial. It remains unknown to what extent this is translated into clinical practice.

aimsTo explore professionals' perspectives on communication support and training addressing the needs of families living with aphasia across disciplines, positions and stages of neurorehabilitation in Denmark. METHODS & PROCEDURES: An online survey with 21 items was developed and distributed via clinical networks and social media. The survey focused on characteristics of current services, perceived needs, barriers and facilitators related to communication support and training. Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis were applied. OUTCOMES &

resultsA total of 285 professionals from different professions and positions completed the survey. The majority of respondents reported that their institution provided communication support and training for individuals living with aphasia and/or their relatives, but often inadequately and several unmet needs were highlighted. The need for a more systematic, flexible, tailored and outreached approach to communication training to address the multi-faceted and evolving needs of families living with aphasia was highlighted. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The results highlight the importance of supporting and training professionals in addressing the needs of families living with aphasia throughout the course of rehabilitation and life with aphasia. This highlights the necessity of developing and providing more flexible and tailored interventions directed at these families in order to achieve genuine and sustainable changes. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject Aphasia impacts both the individual and their families, whose rehabilitation needs are complex and evolving over time. Family-focused interventions such as communication partner training (CPT) are recognised as beneficial yet remain inconsistently implemented and rarely embedded in routine clinical services. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study provides insight into professionals' experiences with CPT and informational support. It reveals that while such services are often offered, they are rarely sufficient in term of timing, content and consistency. It identifies barriers to implementation, including organisational fragmentation, lack of structured training and limited interdisciplinary coordination. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The findings emphasise the importance of recognising the family as a unit of care in aphasia rehabilitation. To meet complex and evolving needs, rehabilitation should be tailored, repeated, outreached and flexible. Sustainable implementation of CPT requires organisational commitment and interdisciplinary collaboration, ensuring that support is both accessible and responsive.

Indexed as

AphasiaAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationFamilyAdultDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurological RehabilitationProfessional-Family RelationsSocial SupportSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42831573
PMCPMC13637052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.