Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42831505›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Being 'The Only Consumer' - Exploring the Lived Experiences of Health Consumer Representatives in Australian Health System Involvement.

Hannah Fielder, Rebecca Kelly, Phoebe Griffin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannah FielderUniversity of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Medicine, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4968-141X
Rebecca KellyUniversity of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Medicine, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7409-8520
Phoebe GriffinUniversity of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Medicine, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8208-5818

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth consumer representatives (HCRs) are increasingly expected to contribute to decision-making across the health system, including at the level of policy, strategy and system-wide governance. However, while HCR involvement is relatively well established at the direct-care and health service-level context, system level involvement remains underdeveloped and poorly understood as a distinct form of participation. In addition, and arguably because of this, HCR involvement at this level continues to face the persistent challenges, such as role confusion and tokenistic 'tick-a-box' engagement, despite increasing policy commitments. This study explores the lived experiences of HCRs in Australia to better understand how system-level involvement is experienced in practice.

methodsThirteen HCRs from across Australia were purposively sampled and participated in semi-structured one-to-one interviews conducted via Zoom or telephone. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed iteratively using an interpretive phenomenological approach.

resultsParticipants' experiences were captured by the prominent theme of being the 'only consumer', reflecting both the uniqueness of their role and expertise, but also the feeling of marginalisation they face. Two cross-cutting influences shaped this experience: power dynamics, including structural and interpersonal inequities and relational factors, particularly allyship and supportive relationships. One key element of the consumer experience was the process of becoming an expert as they gained knowledge of systems and confidence in the value of the consumer perspective. Another was finding meaning in their work both through everyday interactions and long-term contributions to systems change.

conclusionThe quality of HCR involvement in system-level spaces is shaped not only by governance structures, organisational processes and policy commitments, but also by power dynamics, relationships and the extent to which lived experience is recognised as unique expertise. Underpinning this, the ability for HCRs to find meaning in their roles and in genuine partnerships is what moves their involvement beyond tokenism into supported and valued participation. These findings highlight that meaningful system-level HCR involvement depends not only on having consumers 'in the room', but on recognising their expertise, sharing power, building respectful relationships, and designing structures that allow their contributions to influence decisions. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Investigator HF holds the dual role of researcher and HCR peak body worker and has personal lived experience of being an HCR at the health-system level. The inception of the research question was grounded in this lived experience and informed by regular input from two highly experienced HCR peers. Study participants contributed to refining themes and the interpretation of data. Importantly, the central objective of the research was to elevate the insights, reflections, and lived experiences of HCRs.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationConsumer AdvocacyDelivery of Health CareAustraliaDecision MakingHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative Researchconsumersengagementhealth systeminvolvementpatient and public involvement

Identifiers

PMID42831505
PMCPMC13636653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.