ArticleMethodsX2026
A reproducible, diagnostic-guided hybrid Laplace workflow for generalized linear mixed models.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laplace approximation is widely used for generalized linear mixed models because it is fast and compatible with automatic-differentiation software, yet its accuracy can deteriorate when clusters are weakly informative, outcomes are sparse, or conditional random-effect distributions are skewed, heavy-tailed, or poorly conditioned. This article presents a reproducible diagnostic-guided hybrid Laplace workflow. The method begins with an ordinary Laplace fit, assigns blockwise approximation-risk scores, and selectively upgrades only flagged random-effect blocks using higher-fidelity corrections such as adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature, importance sampling, or skew-aware correction. This selectivity retains ordinary Laplace contributions for unflagged blocks but should not be interpreted as a demonstrated wall-clock speed-up: in the scalar benchmarks reported here, diagnostic overhead makes the hybrid slower than global 15-point adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature. A computational advantage is expected only in regimes where the cost of high-fidelity correction materially exceeds the cost of diagnostic screening and remains to be established there. In a rare-event Bernoulli random-intercept validation, the diagnostic score ranked absolute Laplace log-integral error well (Spearman ρ=0.84). Correcting the highest-risk third of blocks reduced the mean absolute error on flagged blocks from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.