ArticleBJUI compass2026
Pain and patient-reported experience after freehand transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia.
Article in BJUI compass, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To characterise patient-reported pain, anxiety, satisfaction and willingness to undergo a repeat procedure, along with complication rate and diagnostic yield, in a large consecutive single-centre cohort of freehand transperineal prostate biopsies (TPPB) performed under local anaesthesia (LA) alone. Patients and methods: Consecutive freehand TPPB cases entered into a single-centre clinical registry between 27 April 2022 and 12 January 2026 were reviewed. Cases performed under general anaesthesia or under LA with intravenous sedation were excluded. The primary outcome was patient-reported overall procedural pain on a 0-10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS), completed immediately after the procedure. Secondary outcomes were VAS scores for anxiety, distress, physical needs, emotional needs and satisfaction; association between pain and anxiety; procedural failure; complication rate; and detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, ISUP grade group ≥2). The tertiary outcome was willingness to undergo a repeat biopsy if clinically indicated. Results: Of 800 consecutive cases, 777 (97.1%) performed under LA alone formed the analytic cohort. Median overall procedural pain was 2.0 (IQR 1.0-3.0), and severe pain (VAS ≥ 7) was reported by 45 of 760 patients (5.9%). Anxiety was moderately correlated with pain (Spearman ρ = 0.51, 95% CI 0.44-0.57), and severe pain was ten times more common above than below the median anxiety score (10.8% vs. 1.0%). Overall, 748 of 756 patients (98.9%, 95% CI 97.9-99.5%) would undergo the procedure again if clinically indicated, including 42 of the 45 (93%) who reported severe pain. Procedural failure occurred in 5 of 777 cases (0.6%) and a complication was noted in 26 of 776 (3.4%). CsPCa was identified in 477 of 769 patients (62.0%), rising stepwise with PI-RADS score (1-2: 18.3%; 3: 22.6%; 4: 70.0%; 5: 88.4%). Conclusions: Freehand TPPB under LA alone is well tolerated in the outpatient setting. Pain is low overall, severe pain is uncommon, and almost all patients would undergo the procedure again as indicated. Patient-reported anxiety is moderately associated with procedural pain and is a plausible modifiable target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.