Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42831178›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Biomedical Publishing Metrics as a Barrier to Knowledge Dissemination.

Brian W Rotenberg, Douglas Chepeha

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian W RotenbergOtolaryngology, Western University, London, CAN.
Douglas ChepehaOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is an outdated biomedical metric that hinders knowledge dissemination. Relying on citation counts creates a skewed, easily manipulated system with a temporal lag that ignores global equity. Frontline clinicians consume research to improve care but rarely generate citations, meaning the JIF cannot capture real-world clinical utility. To ensure rankings reflect true value, publishers must adopt a multi-dimensional matrix prioritizing usage-based Altmetrics, such as verified downloads and views, to instantly measure global clinical application.

Indexed as

altmetric scorecitation indexeigenfactorjournal impact factorpublishing metricspubmed indexed research

Identifiers

PMID42831178
PMCPMC13634471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.