ArticleIDCases2026
Acute bacterial endophthalmitis with focal vitritis at a nasal chandelier illumination port after scleral buckling.
Article in IDCases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chandelier-assisted scleral buckling (CSB) has been reported to offer enhanced fundus visualization and reduced operative time during retinal detachment repair compared with conventional methods. However, the required intraocular penetration creates a potential route for bacterial entry into the eye. Case presentation: A 31-year-old man with high myopia presented with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment involving the macula. He underwent urgent CSB using a 27-gauge chandelier positioned nasally at 5 o'clock. On postoperative day (POD) 10, a localized vitreous opacity appeared precisely at the insertion site. By POD 11, the opacity extended into the inferior vitreous cavity, consistent with acute postoperative endophthalmitis. Despite empirical intravitreal injections of vancomycin and ceftazidime with intensive topical moxifloxacin, the patient developed photophobia, ocular pain, and worsening vitritis on POD 12. An urgent lens-sparing pars plana vitrectomy was performed, and vitreous fluid cultures identified Conclusion: Whereas previously reported cases of CSB-related endophthalmitis typically presented with widespread intraocular inflammation obscuring the primary infectious focus, this case captures the early focal progression of vitritis in a chronological sequence. The localization at the nasal chandelier port provides visual clues to a possible entry route. The appearance of a localized vitreous opacity corresponding to a chandelier insertion site-even if subtle-should raise suspicion of acute endophthalmitis and prompt timely evaluation and treatment. The route and timing of bacterial entry cannot be established from this case alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.