ArticleCureus2026
Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome Mimicking Ulcerative Colitis: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a benign rectal disorder associated with abnormal defecation and mucosal prolapse. Its clinical and endoscopic features may mimic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We report the case of a 28-year-old woman with longstanding obstructed defecation who presented with recurrent bloody mucus discharge and severe iron-deficiency anemia (hemoglobin 6.6 g/dL), which was treated with intravenous iron infusions. C-reactive protein was normal, whereas fecal calprotectin was markedly elevated. Initial colonoscopy showed erythematous and congested mucosa extending from the anal verge to 20 cm, with a large ulcer, raising suspicion of ulcerative colitis. However, the initial biopsies were inconclusive. Following clinical worsening, repeat colonoscopy revealed a 5-cm elevated rectal lesion with central ulceration. Histological examination demonstrated epithelial loss, granulation tissue, villiform crypt changes, and characteristic fibromuscular hyperplasia of the lamina propria, establishing the diagnosis of SRUS. Magnetic resonance defecography revealed an anterior rectocele and internal rectal prolapse, while anorectal manometry demonstrated dyssynergic defecation. Conservative measures and biofeedback provided incomplete improvement, with persistent rectal bleeding. Given the documented internal rectal prolapse and refractory symptoms, laparoscopic ventral rectopexy was performed, resulting in a favorable postoperative clinical course with marked symptomatic improvement and normalization of hemoglobin to 13.7 g/dL. SRUS should be considered when inflammatory-appearing rectal lesions are not supported by histological evidence of IBD, particularly in patients with obstructed defecation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.