Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42831153›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Correlation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual Energy Computed Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Mediastinal Lymph Node Staging in Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.

David Adebayo, Andrew England, Mark McEntee, David J Ryan, Michael Maher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David AdebayoDepartment of Radiography and Radiation Therapy, University College Cork, Cork, IRL.
Andrew EnglandDepartment of Radiography and Radiation Therapy, University College Cork, Cork, IRL.
Mark McEnteeDepartment of Radiography and Radiation Therapy, University College Cork, Cork, IRL.
David J RyanCollege of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, IRL.
Michael MaherDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Cork University Hospital, Cork, IRL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to correlate the accuracy of derived parameters of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) against the reference imaging modality of choice, positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), in the diagnosis and staging of mediastinal lymph nodes in lung cancer. An extensive database search was conducted to retrieve literature comparing the performance of DECT parameters against PET/CT. Articles published between 2010 and January 2025 were retrieved from Embase, Web of Science, PubMed/MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Ovid. Articles were screened and selected based on clearly defined inclusion criteria. Methodological quality, heterogeneity, and bias were evaluated, and data were extracted and synthesized to identify correlations between DECT parameters and PET/CT parameters in mediastinal lymph node staging. Five articles that met the inclusion criteria were included in this review; these consisted of 212 patients, with 314 pathological mediastinal lymph nodes. DECT attenuation parameters including arterial phase/delayed phase ratio (A/D ratio) or maximum iodine related attenuation (IRA

Indexed as

dectfdg-pet/ctlung cancermediastinal lymph nodesstaging

Identifiers

PMID42831153
PMCPMC13634474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.