ReviewInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2026
Unmet Needs and New Opportunities in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Italy: A Narrative Review with Insights from the GULP Study.
Review in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The "DescribinG bUrden of COPD and occurrence of mortaLity in a cohort of Italian Patients" (GULP) study was conducted to investigate the potential of biological treatments for patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The purpose of this article was to perform a narrative review highlighting the role of type 2 inflammation in the mechanism of disease for COPD, summarizing the efficacy data of the Phase III RCTs that investigated biologics in COPD, and exploring the potential role for biological treatment in this setting with a particular focus on Italian patients with COPD. To this end, we conducted an exploratory analysis of GULP study data to identify patients at high risk of exacerbations, with high symoptom burden and classify them based upon the eosinophilic counts, to provide further insights into the potential use of biologics in this cohort. Out of the 1111 patients of the GULP cohort, we retrieved in total 286 (25.7%) GULP participants with ≥2 moderate or ≥1 severe exacerbation per year. Of them, despite maintenance therapy with dual bronchodilators or triple therapy, a high symptom burden (dyspnea, cough and chronic sputum production) was present in between 51.1 and 74.8%, while patients that presented with eosinophilic COPD accounted for the 7.2% of the patients at risk. This indicates that biological agents, specifically those that target the type 2 inflammatory response in COPD, should be considered in symptomatic patients with COPD and unstable disease, but that careful and pro-active phenotyping through clinical and biomarker evaluation is mandatory. Dupilumab is currently approved in Italy for eosinophilc exacerbating COPD patients, and through its favorable efficacy and safety profile, could represent a valid opportunity for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.