Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42831088›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2026

Unmet Needs and New Opportunities in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Italy: A Narrative Review with Insights from the GULP Study.

Dejan Radovanovic, Fulvio Braido, Marco Contoli, Angelo Guido Corsico, Fabiano Di Marco, Claudio Micheletto, Girolamo Pelaia, Paola Rogliani, Nicola Scichilone, Paolo Solidoro and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dejan RadovanovicDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milano, 20157, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9013-3418
Fulvio BraidoIRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2460-4709
Marco ContoliDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2731-5809
Angelo Guido CorsicoDivision of Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8716-4694
Fabiano Di MarcoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1743-0504
Claudio MichelettoRespiratory Unit, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1138-3882
Girolamo PelaiaDepartment of Health Sciences, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9288-8913
Paola RoglianiDipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale, Università 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7801-5040
Nicola ScichiloneDipartimento PROMISE, Università Degli Studi Di Palermo, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6400-6573
Paolo SolidoroCardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Division of Respiratory Medicine, AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3972-2871
Pierachille SantusDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milano, 20157, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3462-8253

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "DescribinG bUrden of COPD and occurrence of mortaLity in a cohort of Italian Patients" (GULP) study was conducted to investigate the potential of biological treatments for patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The purpose of this article was to perform a narrative review highlighting the role of type 2 inflammation in the mechanism of disease for COPD, summarizing the efficacy data of the Phase III RCTs that investigated biologics in COPD, and exploring the potential role for biological treatment in this setting with a particular focus on Italian patients with COPD. To this end, we conducted an exploratory analysis of GULP study data to identify patients at high risk of exacerbations, with high symoptom burden and classify them based upon the eosinophilic counts, to provide further insights into the potential use of biologics in this cohort. Out of the 1111 patients of the GULP cohort, we retrieved in total 286 (25.7%) GULP participants with ≥2 moderate or ≥1 severe exacerbation per year. Of them, despite maintenance therapy with dual bronchodilators or triple therapy, a high symptom burden (dyspnea, cough and chronic sputum production) was present in between 51.1 and 74.8%, while patients that presented with eosinophilic COPD accounted for the 7.2% of the patients at risk. This indicates that biological agents, specifically those that target the type 2 inflammatory response in COPD, should be considered in symptomatic patients with COPD and unstable disease, but that careful and pro-active phenotyping through clinical and biomarker evaluation is mandatory. Dupilumab is currently approved in Italy for eosinophilc exacerbating COPD patients, and through its favorable efficacy and safety profile, could represent a valid opportunity for these patients.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsBiological ProductsLungPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBronchodilator AgentsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansItalyMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiological ProductsBronchodilator AgentsbenralizumabCOPDdupilumabeosinophilsmepolizumabmonoclonal antibodiestype 2 inflammation

Identifiers

PMID42831088
PMCPMC13634320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.