ArticleJournal of exercise science and fitness2026
Locomotion-specific metabolic demands in 30-s anaerobic efforts.
Article in Journal of exercise science and fitness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to examine whether energy system contributions differ across locomotion modalities during 30-s all-out exercise. Methods: Sixteen trained male team-sport athletes completed a Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT), a 30-s continuous jumping test (CJ30), and a 30-s all-out running test (RUN30) in randomized order. Aerobic, glycolytic, and phosphagen energy contributions were estimated using the PCr-La-O Results: Total energy expenditure was higher in RUN30 (130.8 ± 18.0 kJ) and WAnT (125.6 ± 14.9 kJ) than in CJ30 (95.4 ± 19.6 kJ), and glycolytic energy contribution was also greater in RUN30 (55.2 ± 9.4 kJ) and WAnT (54.3 ± 6.3 kJ) than in CJ30 (26.7 ± 7.9 kJ). Phosphagen energy was higher in RUN30 (49.6 ± 7.5 kJ) than in CJ30 (43.3 ± 10.1 kJ; ηp Conclusion: These findings indicate modality-associated differences in absolute energy demands, with greater glycolytic and total energy expenditure in running and cycling than jumping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.