ArticleJVS-vascular science2026
Article in JVS-vascular science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), defined by somatic mutations in hematopoietic cells, is associated with cardiovascular disease through proinflammatory mechanisms. We investigated whether CHIP, and specifically Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective cohort pilot study, 47 patients with peripheral arterial disease who had undergone femoropopliteal or femorocrural bypass grafting were analyzed. CHIP status was assessed from peripheral blood using a 40-gene myeloid sequencing panel. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for diabetes and smoking status. Results: Of 47 patients, 33 had bypass graft occlusion and 14 had patent grafts. CHIP was detected in 14 individuals (29.8%). The mutational spectrum differed markedly between groups: in the patent graft group, all CHIP mutations were in Conclusions: Clinical relevance: Clonal hematopoiesis, particularly
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.