Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42831054›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Vertical collision risk of Red-crowned Cranes at coastal onshore wind farms in eastern China.

Kai Dong, Xinyi Hu, Changhu Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kai DongCollege of Life Sciences, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Xinyi HuCollege of Life Sciences, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Changhu LuCollege of Life Sciences, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With the continued expansion of coastal wind farms toward wetland edges, understanding the mechanisms that drive collision risk for large waterbirds around wind turbines is becoming increasingly important. Methods: Based on satellite tracking data from seven Red-crowned Cranes ( Results: Crane flight height showed clear vertical overlap with the RSZ, but potential collision risk was not evenly distributed throughout the RSZ. Instead, risk was concentrated in several adjacent low to medium altitude bands. The 30-35 m band contributed the most, followed by the 35-40 m and 40-45 m bands. Simulations showed that increasing turbine hub-height could substantially reduce collision risk by shifting the RSZ upward as a whole. A 20 m increase in hub-height reduced overall risk by 48.9%. Discussion: Based on empirical flight height data, this study revealed the heterogeneous vertical distribution of potential collision risk for Red-crowned Cranes and the mechanisms underlying its formation. It also identified key risk height bands, providing a more mechanistic basis for turbine-design optimization, risk mitigation, and coordination between coastal wind power development and waterbird conservation.

Indexed as

BirdsWindAnimalsChinaWetlandsCoastal wetlandsCollision riskGrus japonensisSatellite trackingWind energy

Identifiers

PMID42831054
PMCPMC13634307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.