ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2026
Penetrating spinal cord injury transiently inhibits responsiveness to touch in mice.
Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating mechanical trauma of the spinal cord. We recently showed that penetration of fine needles from dorsal to ventral regions in the spinal cord disturbed spontaneous locomotion in mice. However, it has not been verified if penetrating SCI at the dorsal side of the spinal cord, responsible regions for sensory functions, changes movements after sensory stimulation. In this study, penetration into the dorsal midline or dorsolateral regions was separately applied to mice. Using these mice, we evaluated withdrawal movements after tactile and thermal stimulations as well as locomotion. Penetrating SCI at midline and dorsolateral regions exhibited normal Basso Mouse Scale for Locomotion (BMS) and beam walking test scores. In addition, locomotion in open field was not affected in these mice. Also, we showed that responses after thermal stimulation on hot plate was not changed in mice with midline and dorsolateral penetrations. However, paw withdrawal after both static and dynamic touches were transiently inhibited in mice after both midline and dorsolateral penetrations. This model is a valuable tool for examining the functional and pathological consequences of damage to specific, discrete regions or tracts within the spinal cord.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.