Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42831047›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2026

A daily peat moisture code for monitoring and predicting peatland fire danger.

S L Wilkinson, G J Verkaik, D K Thompson, J M Waddington, E Arango Ruda, B M Wotton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S L WilkinsonSchool of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.
G J VerkaikSchool of Earth, Environment and Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
D K ThompsonGreat Lakes Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, P6A 2E5, Canada.
J M WaddingtonSchool of Earth, Environment and Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
E Arango RudaSchool of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.
B M WottonGreat Lakes Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, P6A 2E5, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peatlands, ecosystems with deep (>40 cm) organic soils, play diverging roles in landscape wildfire regimes based on their moisture status. When peatlands are dry they can be the source of high-severity fire and carbon and smoke emissions. The daily Peat Moisture Code (PMC) presented here calculates the change in storage in the peatland water balance and accounts for peatland ecohydrological feedbacks by integrating peat hydrophysical properties using novel equations. Evapotranspiration is modelled using a modified Priestley-Taylor method. The change in water storage is converted to an index (the PMC) that correlates with water table position by accounting for the Specific Yield of peat at different depths and a negative (dampening) feedback on evapotranspiration. The PMC represents the moisture status of peatlands where high PMC values indicate dry fuel conditions driving higher fire danger and high-severity burns. Exemplary fire danger thresholds are presented for the example to assist with interpretation. The PMC is a generic method for quantifying peatland fire danger in varying ecoregions and peatland types. ● Water balance model with daily bookkeeping approach ● Minimal data requirements consistent with federal and provincial weather stations ● Represents the methodological basis for the hourly PMC of the next-generation Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System.

Indexed as

FirePeatRisk

Identifiers

PMID42831047
PMCPMC13634467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.