ArticleeNeurologicalSci2026
Construct validity of the timed 25-foot walk and robustness of clinical benchmarks in multiple sclerosis: exploratory analyses of TEAMS study.
Article in eNeurologicalSci, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03117881 (Comparative Effectiveness Trial Between a Clinic- and Home-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Telerehabilitation Intervention for Adults With Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Effectiveness Trial Between a Clinic- and Home-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Telerehabilitation Intervention for Adults With Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25-FW) is a widely used performance measure of ambulatory disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). Fewer studies have examined its construct validity relative to patient-reported outcomes or assessed robustness of previously proposed benchmarks in large cohorts. Objective: To examine the construct validity of T25-FW using patient-reported health outcomes and to evaluate robustness of previously proposed clinical benchmarks. Methods: Baseline data from 759 participants with MS enrolled in Tele-Exercise and Multiple Sclerosis (TEAMS) trial were analyzed. Associations between T25-FW performance and Short Form-36 physical functioning and emotional well-being subscales were evaluated using Spearman correlations. Previously proposed clinical benchmarks (<6 s, 6-7.99 s, ≥8 s) were evaluated in relation to patient-reported outcomes. Additional exploratory analyses included median-based anchors, segmented regression, and ROC methods. Results: T25-FW performance showed a strong association with SF-36 physical functioning (ρ = -0.71), which remained significant after adjustment for demographic factors (ρ = -0.39). In contrast, correlations with SF-36 emotional well-being were negligible. Stratification by established T25-FW clinical benchmarks demonstrated a clear gradient in physical functioning, with highest scores among participants completing the test in <6 s and lowest among those requiring ≥8 s or unable to perform test. Candidate cut points derived from multiple analytical approaches clustered around similar walking-time ranges and demonstrated consistent associations with physical functioning. Conclusions: The T25-FW demonstrates strong construct validity with patient-reported physical functioning and clear divergent validity from emotional well-being. Findings support robustness of proposed T25-FW benchmark categories and reinforce the utility of T25-FW as measure of ambulatory disability in MS.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03117881.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.