Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42831000›Full record

ArticleeNeurologicalSci2026

Construct validity of the timed 25-foot walk and robustness of clinical benchmarks in multiple sclerosis: exploratory analyses of TEAMS study.

Salma Aly, Hui-Ju Young, Tracy Flemming-Tracy, Navneet Kaur Baidwan, James H Rimmer, Robert Motl, Tapan Mehta

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeurologicalSci, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03117881 (Comparative Effectiveness Trial Between a Clinic- and Home-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Telerehabilitation Intervention for Adults With Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03117881 nacompletednot on this map

Comparative Effectiveness Trial Between a Clinic- and Home-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Telerehabilitation Intervention for Adults With Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamRan2018 to 2022Enrolled911ConditionsMultiple SclerosisArmsDirectCAM, TeleCAM, rDirectCAM
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Salma AlyDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
Hui-Ju YoungUAB SHP Research Collaborative, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Tracy Flemming-TracyNational Center on Health, Physical Activity and Disability (NCHPAD), Birmingham, AL, USA.
Navneet Kaur BaidwanDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
James H RimmerUAB SHP Research Collaborative, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Robert MotlDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
Tapan MehtaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25-FW) is a widely used performance measure of ambulatory disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). Fewer studies have examined its construct validity relative to patient-reported outcomes or assessed robustness of previously proposed benchmarks in large cohorts. Objective: To examine the construct validity of T25-FW using patient-reported health outcomes and to evaluate robustness of previously proposed clinical benchmarks. Methods: Baseline data from 759 participants with MS enrolled in Tele-Exercise and Multiple Sclerosis (TEAMS) trial were analyzed. Associations between T25-FW performance and Short Form-36 physical functioning and emotional well-being subscales were evaluated using Spearman correlations. Previously proposed clinical benchmarks (<6 s, 6-7.99 s, ≥8 s) were evaluated in relation to patient-reported outcomes. Additional exploratory analyses included median-based anchors, segmented regression, and ROC methods. Results: T25-FW performance showed a strong association with SF-36 physical functioning (ρ = -0.71), which remained significant after adjustment for demographic factors (ρ = -0.39). In contrast, correlations with SF-36 emotional well-being were negligible. Stratification by established T25-FW clinical benchmarks demonstrated a clear gradient in physical functioning, with highest scores among participants completing the test in <6 s and lowest among those requiring ≥8 s or unable to perform test. Candidate cut points derived from multiple analytical approaches clustered around similar walking-time ranges and demonstrated consistent associations with physical functioning. Conclusions: The T25-FW demonstrates strong construct validity with patient-reported physical functioning and clear divergent validity from emotional well-being. Findings support robustness of proposed T25-FW benchmark categories and reinforce the utility of T25-FW as measure of ambulatory disability in MS.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03117881.

Indexed as

Clinical benchmarkConstruct validityMultiple sclerosisT25-FW

Identifiers

PMID42831000
PMCPMC13634259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.