ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Prognostic utility of the revised post-cardiac arrest syndrome for therapeutic hypothermia score in pediatric patients with post-cardiac arrest syndrome.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The accurate prognosis of post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) is critical for guiding intensive care and family communication. The revised post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome for Therapeutic hypothermia (rCAST) score incorporates six readily available clinical variables and has shown promise in children. However, prior validations involved older children. We aimed to externally validate rCAST scores in a cohort of infants and young children. Methods: We retrospectively examined patients with PCAS (with pre-arrest pediatric cerebral performance category scores of 1-3 and receiving targeted temperature management) admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) between December 2016 and March 2024. Patients were stratified into low-, moderate-, and high-severity groups based on their rCAST scores. The primary outcome was neurological status at PICU discharge. Results: Among 5456 PICU admissions, 75 were included (median age, 17 months [interquartile range: 4-72]; 68% without pre-existing conditions). Favorable neurological outcomes occurred in 28% of patients overall, with 76% in the low ( Conclusions: The rCAST score demonstrated good discriminative ability for neurological outcomes in infants and young children with PCAS. However, unfavorable outcomes in some patients with low scores warrant caution in clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.