ArticleAcademic pathology
Closing the gap: A workflow-based analysis of postconsent failure to restore hospital autopsy utilization.
Article in Academic pathology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hospital autopsy rates continue to decline despite their established role in diagnostic quality assurance, patient safety, and medical education. At our academic institution, autopsy utilization decreased to less than 1% of inpatient deaths. We hypothesized that this decline reflects failures within the autopsy workflow rather than limitations in consent acquisition. We analyzed 4229 inpatient deaths from 2019 to 2025 and performed a detailed audit of 140 autopsy consents to evaluate documentation quality, accuracy of indication, and involvement of pathology personnel. In addition, clinical resident physicians were surveyed using a six-scenario assessment to evaluate recognition of autopsy indications. Autopsy utilization declined from 3.9% to 0.57%, while the consent-to-autopsy conversion rate decreased from 52% to 8%, indicating substantial loss of cases after consent had been obtained. Forty percent of consents were incomplete or inaccurate, and pathology personnel were involved in only 1.4% of cases. Survey results demonstrated variable recognition of autopsy indications and infrequent consideration of autopsy in clinical practice. A workflow-based model showed that targeted improvements in consent quality and initiation could increase autopsy utilization up to 4.4-fold. These findings indicate that autopsy underutilization reflects modifiable system-level inefficiencies rather than solely cultural or financial barriers. A structured, workflow-based approach provides a reproducible framework to improve autopsy utilization and reestablish its role in quality assurance and medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.