Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42830946›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Targeted neuronal stimulation modulates working memory via astrocytic interactions: Insights from a spiking neuron-astrocyte model.

Pedram Naghieh, Mahmood Amiri, Herbert Peremans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pedram NaghiehMedical Biology Research Center, Institute of Health Technology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Mahmood AmiriMedical Biology Research Center, Institute of Health Technology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Herbert PeremansDepartment of Engineering Management, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain stimulation offers promising avenues for cognitive enhancement, yet conventional paradigms often overlook the active role of astrocytes and treat stimulation as an all-or-none intervention without considering spatial information or competition among temporal dynamics. We present a spiking neuron-astrocyte network model integrated with 2D recording and stimulation arrays to investigate how targeted neuronal stimulation modulates working memory (WM) via neuroglial interactions. WM depends on a temporal hierarchy: rapid neuronal spiking, synaptic glutamate release, and slow astrocytic calcium signaling. In three experiments we demonstrate: (1) targeted excitatory stimulation restores WM in synaptically impaired networks by reactivating astrocytic calcium dynamics; (2) inhibitory stimulation disrupts WM maintenance by blocking the necessary neuroglial feedback loop; and (3) excitatory stimulation during the sample phase augments WM encoding for novel patterns. Our findings underscore the importance of spatiotemporal precision in stimulation protocols and establish astrocytes as pivotal mediators, providing a new framework for bio-inspired memory systems.

Indexed as

Biocomputational methodCognitive neuroscienceNeural networksNeuroscience

Identifiers

PMID42830946
PMCPMC13634410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.